Skip to content
Horizon Scanner
Book a demo
SFDRFramework page

SFDR monitoring
in a single inbox.

SFDR is being re-engineered. The Level-1 framework (Regulation (EU) 2019/2088) — applied since March 2021 — has produced the de-facto product categories "Article 8" and "Article 9", but its intended consumer-disclosure purpose has been overshadowed by their use as labels. The Commission's SFDR review is underway: a Level-1 amendment is expected to replace Articles 8/9 with explicit product categories. Until then the existing RTS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288) and PAI templates remain in force. Horizon Scanner watches every consultation, every ESMA enforcement priority, and every national supervisor letter.

Book a demoHow scoring works

Scope

What SFDR covers — and what we crawl for it.

  • Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 and Level-1 reform

    The SFDR itself plus the Commission's reform consultation responses, draft Level-1 amendments, ECON/Council positions. Replacement of Articles 8/9 with explicit product categories is the load-bearing change.

  • SFDR RTS (Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288)

    The technical standards: pre-contractual, periodic and website disclosure templates; PAI statement Annex I; principal-adverse-impact indicators methodology. Joint-Committee amendments tracked.

  • Article 8 / 9 product categorisation

    Operational questions on what qualifies as an Article 8 or 9 product. ESMA naming-guidelines for ESG-related fund names, national supervisor positions on reclassification triggers and "do-no-significant-harm" assessment.

  • PAI statements (entity + product level)

    Article 4 entity-level PAI statement, Article 7 product-level PAI consideration. The 18 mandatory + opt-in indicators, data sourcing, and the proportionality discussion for smaller participants.

  • ESMA enforcement priorities

    ESMA's annual enforcement-priorities communications affecting sustainability disclosures. Common-mistake reports from peer reviews and the Common Supervisory Action.

  • Cross-cuts with CSRD and Taxonomy

    PAI indicators draw on CSRD/ESRS data points; Taxonomy alignment % feeds Article 5/6 disclosures. Inconsistencies between the three regimes generate supervisory letters — we surface the cross-cuts.

How Horizon Scanner helps

Specifically for SFDR teams.

  • 01

    Filtered by product type

    Configure your SFDR product universe — Article 6, 8, 9 products. The inbox filters to the categories your firm actually distributes; reclassification triggers are routed with extra severity.

  • 02

    Tracks PAI data sourcing

    PAI indicators rely on investee-company data. When CSRD/ESRS data points change, the affected PAI indicators flag for review with a diff. Useful when your sustainability data vendor updates a methodology mid-cycle.

  • 03

    Routes to ESG, product, sales

    Default routing: RTS amendments and PAI items to ESG; product-categorisation Q&As to product; ESMA fund-naming guidelines to sales and marketing.

  • 04

    Reform-readiness mode

    The pending Level-1 reform will materially change product-categorisation. We track the legislative pipeline (Commission proposal → ECON → Council → trilogue → adoption) as a separate stream with clear status tags so your team isn't surprised by an in-force date.

Sources monitored

The regulators we crawl for SFDR.

  • EUR-LexRegulation (EU) 2019/2088, Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 (RTS), Taxonomy Regulation (EU) 2020/852, all amending acts.
  • CommissionReform consultation papers, EU FAQ on SFDR, delegated acts amending the RTS.
  • ESMANaming guidelines for ESG-related fund names, enforcement priorities for sustainability disclosures, Common Supervisory Action outputs.
  • EBAJoint-Committee work with ESMA and EIOPA on SFDR RTS, technical clarifications on PAI methodology.
  • EIOPAInsurance-sector specific SFDR application — IBIPs as financial products under SFDR, cross-cuts with Solvency II Pillar 3.
  • BaFinBaFin position papers on Article 8/9 classification, German fund-name discussions, supervisory letters to AIFMs/UCITS ManCos.
  • AMFAMF Doctrine notes on SFDR product categorisation and the French approach to ESG fund labelling.
  • CSSF / National peersCSSF supervisory communications on SFDR for Luxembourg-domiciled funds, AFM, Consob and other national-supervisor positions.

Custom sources can be added in minutes — supervisory blog feeds, association circulars, internal counsel memos all route through the same engine.

FAQ

What SFDR buyers ask first.

How do you handle the pending Level-1 reform without flooding the inbox?

Reform-related findings are tagged "SFDR reform" and sit in their own sub-stream with an explicit legislative-process status (consultation / proposal / ECON / Council / trilogue / adopted). Until a Commission proposal is formally tabled, items are surfaced at lower severity and grouped weekly.

Can we monitor only Article 8/9 products and skip Article 6?

Yes. Each product category is a routing taxonomy of its own. A team that only distributes Article 8 and 9 products doesn't see Article 6-only items, but cross-cutting RTS amendments (template changes, PAI methodology, ESMA enforcement) are surfaced because they affect any SFDR product.

How does SFDR reconcile with CSRD and the Taxonomy?

PAI indicators consume CSRD-reported data; Taxonomy alignment % feeds Article 5/6 disclosures. We cross-tag findings touching multiple regimes — a CSRD methodological clarification on Scope-3 emissions, for example, flags PAI indicator 1 as needing re-review. The audit trail is deduplicated.

Does the inbox cover anti-greenwashing actions?

Yes. ESMA's anti-greenwashing common-supervisory-action outputs, national supervisor enforcement decisions, and EBA/EIOPA joint statements on misleading sustainability claims are all surfaced — tagged "anti-greenwashing" and routed to ESG and compliance.

Go deeper

More on SFDR in depth.

See SFDR in your inbox.
Twenty minutes. No slides.

Book a demoSee all frameworks